.png)
As MSPs move toward more intelligence-led service models, the best security awareness platforms are no longer just content libraries. They help partners deliver security awareness training, phishing simulations, policy proof, reporting, and user risk visibility across multiple clients with low admin.
That distinction matters. Most platforms can teach a user to spot a phishing email. Far fewer are built for the realities of an MSP: onboarding clients quickly, automating campaigns across tenants, proving value in a quarterly review, and packaging it all as a profitable recurring service.
For MSPs, the right security awareness training platform should be easy to deploy across clients, simple to automate, and strong enough to support reporting, compliance, and renewal conversations.
This guide compares 10 security awareness platforms that MSPs commonly evaluate, what each is best at, and where it fits. The lineup spans MSP-first awareness tools, enterprise content-heavy platforms partners still compare, compliance-led options, and broader human risk management platforms.
Best fit for broader human risk management: usecure is a strong option for MSPs that want to deliver a repeatable human risk management service rather than just send training. It brings training, phishing simulations, policy management, and dark web monitoring together under a single user risk score, with multi-tenant delivery, low-admin automation, and reporting built for client reviews.
Why this matters as MSPs move toward MIPs
As MSPs evolve toward Managed Intelligence Provider models, security awareness needs to become more than a training service. Partners need platforms that help them understand client risk, prioritize action, prove progress, and turn human behavior into a measurable, repeatable service.
That means the best MSP-ready awareness platforms should support more than course delivery. They should help partners connect training results, phishing performance, policy acknowledgment, breach exposure, and reporting into a clearer picture of human risk across every client.
This is where security awareness can become part of a broader human risk service.
What makes a security awareness platform MSP-ready?
An MSP-ready platform is built around managing many clients, not a single organization. Three things separate it from an enterprise-first tool.
First, it should scale without scaling your admin. Adding a client should not mean rebuilding campaigns from scratch, so look for centralized multi-tenant management, delegated admin, and white labeling.
Second, it should prove value in client language. Reporting has to work in a QBR, not just an internal dashboard, which means client-ready reports, risk trends, and user-level visibility rather than raw completion stats.
Third, it should support a commercial model. You should be able to package and sell it profitably, so MSP pricing, simple packaging, and low operational overhead matter as much as the features themselves.
Beyond those fundamentals, the platforms below differ most in how far they take automation, how well they support compliance conversations, whether they include dark web monitoring, and whether they show human risk or just training activity.
Platform comparison overview
Top 10 security awareness platforms for MSPs
1. usecure
usecure is a strong security awareness platform for MSPs that want to move beyond awareness delivery into human risk management.
Most awareness tools tell you who completed a course or clicked a simulated email. usecure combines adaptive awareness training, phishing simulations, simplified policy management, and actionable dark web monitoring under a single user risk score, so partners can see which clients and users need attention first and prove progress over time.
For MSPs, that supports a stronger, more repeatable service: multi-tenant management from one portal, automation that keeps admin low, and reporting designed for client reviews rather than internal dashboards. Instead of leading a QBR with completion rates, partners can lead with where risk is concentrated and what to do next, which is the kind of measurable, intelligence-led service many MSPs are building toward.
Trusted by 2,000+ MSPs and 15,000+ companies worldwide, usecure is built for scalable delivery whether you manage one tenant or hundreds.
Best fit: MSPs that want training, phishing, policy management, dark web monitoring, and human risk visibility in one platform they can package as a recurring service.
2. Phin Security
Phin Security is a heavily MSP-focused platform built around hands-off awareness training and phishing automation, with fast onboarding and real-time analytics.
It appeals to partners who want SAT and phishing to run with as little manual effort as possible. Onboarding is quick and campaign automation is central to its positioning, which suits lean MSP teams.
MSPs that need policy workflows, credential exposure visibility, or broader human risk reporting should compare scope carefully to understand whether Phin covers everything they need or whether additional tools are required.
If you are weighing Phin specifically, see our Phin Security alternatives guide for a closer comparison.
Best fit: MSPs prioritizing low-admin, automated awareness and phishing delivery.
3. Hook Security
Hook Security offers managed security awareness training, phishing simulations, and security testing with an autopilot-style delivery model.
For MSPs that want done-for-you or low-admin awareness, Hook is straightforward and easy to package as a managed service, with clear, approachable positioning that helps explain the value to clients.
MSPs that need policy workflows, credential exposure visibility, or user-level risk reporting should check how far those capabilities are supported and whether the platform fits their wider service model.
Best fit: MSPs wanting simple, autopilot-style awareness and phishing delivery.
4. Breach Secure Now
Breach Secure Now is an MSP-focused platform covering cybersecurity training, AI awareness, productivity training, HIPAA compliance, simulated phishing, and dark web monitoring.
Its strengths are channel fit and breadth of training themes, including AI readiness and productivity content beyond standard security awareness. Partners may compare alternatives when they want a different delivery model, broader human risk visibility, stronger automation, or reporting that connects multiple risk signals.
For a closer look, see our Breach Secure Now alternatives guide.
Best fit: MSPs focused on training, AI awareness, HIPAA-aligned content, and dark web conversations with SMB clients.
5. Huntress Managed SAT / Curricula
https://www.huntress.com/platform/security-awareness-training
Huntress Managed SAT, built on the Curricula acquisition, delivers managed security awareness training, threat and phishing simulations, reporting, and managed learning.
Its main appeal is ecosystem fit. MSPs already running Huntress for managed detection and response may prefer to keep awareness within the same vendor relationship and standardize their stack across clients.
Its center of gravity is broader managed security, so MSPs looking for a dedicated human risk management workflow should compare reporting, policy, and risk-prioritization capabilities carefully.
Best fit: MSPs already using Huntress who want awareness bundled into a wider security platform.
6. KnowBe4
KnowBe4 is the best-known name in security awareness, with a large content library, broad phishing templates, AI-driven training and phishing, and enterprise-grade reporting.
For MSPs, it offers depth and recognition, but partners should compare packaging, admin effort, and delivery fit carefully, especially when serving smaller clients or managing many tenants.
If you are comparing KnowBe4 directly, see our KnowBe4 alternatives guide.
Best fit: Enterprises and larger MSPs that need deep SAT content breadth and broad market recognition.
7. MetaCompliance
https://www.metacompliance.com
MetaCompliance combines human risk management, awareness training, compliance, policy management, automated workflows, risk scoring, and audit reporting, with a clear compliance-led emphasis.
For MSPs serving regulated clients, the policy and audit depth is a real strength, and it covers more of the human risk picture than training-only tools. It leans compliance-led rather than MSP-operations-led, so partners prioritizing fast onboarding and lightweight delivery should compare workflows carefully.
Best fit: Compliance-led teams and MSPs needing awareness, policy, and audit reporting together.
8. Infosec IQ
https://www.infosecinstitute.com/iq/
Infosec IQ offers role-based training, phishing simulations, compliance tools, and a broad awareness content catalog.
It suits buyers who want structured, content-rich programs with defined learning paths and compliance-oriented assignments. For MSPs, it is strongest where clients want depth and structure rather than the lightest-touch managed service.
MSPs should compare how easily campaigns, reporting, and client management scale across multiple tenants, especially if they need a repeatable service model rather than a single-client training program.
Best fit: Buyers prioritizing content breadth and structured training programs.
9. HacWare
HacWare focuses on automated security awareness and AI-driven phishing simulation, with relevance to MSPs wanting hands-off, automated delivery.
As a challenger, its appeal is automation and AI-driven phishing realism with low manual effort. MSPs interested in automated phishing simulation should compare its training depth, policy workflows, and reporting against broader human risk management platforms.
Best fit: MSPs interested in automated, AI-driven phishing simulation.
10. Sophos Phish Threat
https://www.sophos.com/en-us/products/phish-threat
Sophos Phish Threat provides phishing attack simulation, end-user training, automated campaigns, and reporting inside the Sophos ecosystem.
For existing Sophos customers, keeping phishing-led training within the same vendor environment may be convenient. It is primarily a phishing simulation and training option, so partners looking for broader policy, dark web, or human risk workflows may need to compare additional tools.
For a wider view of phishing-led options, see our guide to the best phishing simulation tools.
Best fit: Sophos customers wanting phishing simulation and training in their existing stack.
How to choose the right platform
The right platform depends on your service model and the clients you serve. A few criteria matter most for MSPs.
Multi-tenant management
Can you run every client from one portal, with delegated admin and white labeling, without duplicating work for each new tenant?
Automation
Can training, phishing, enrollment, reminders, and reporting run on a schedule once configured, rather than manually each cycle?
Phishing simulation depth
Can you run realistic campaigns across clients with point-of-click training and clear reporting, without heavy monthly admin?
Policy management and compliance proof
Can you show that policies were distributed, acknowledged, and tracked? For regulated clients, this supports work toward standards like those in our guide to NIS2 compliance tools.
Dark web visibility
Can you surface exposed credentials at user level to turn an abstract risk conversation into a concrete one?
Reporting and human risk visibility
Can the platform tell a client which users or teams need attention and whether risk is improving, rather than just how many finished a course?
This is the capability most often missing from awareness-only tools, and one of the clearest reasons MSPs move toward human risk management platforms.
For more on this market shift, see our guide to human risk management tools.
Commercial fit
Can you package it profitably as a recurring service with pricing and overhead that scale in margin as well as headcount?
Two red flags are worth watching for: reporting only your team can understand and completion rates presented as the headline metric. The first costs you time every quarter. The second suggests the platform may be measuring activity more than risk.
Why usecure is a strong fit for MSPs
usecure is built for partners who want to deliver human risk management at scale.
Training, phishing, policy, and dark web monitoring feed a single user risk score, with multi-tenant management from one portal, automation that keeps admin low, and client-ready reporting designed for QBRs and renewals.
That combination is what lets an MSP lead a client review with where risk is concentrated and what to do next, rather than how many people completed a course, and package the whole thing as a repeatable, profitable service line as partners move toward more intelligence-led models.
Compare MSP-ready human risk platforms or book a demo to see how usecure supports MSP delivery.
FAQ
What is the best security awareness platform for MSPs?
usecure is a strong option for MSPs that want training, phishing simulations, policy management, dark web monitoring, and human risk visibility in one multi-tenant platform. Phin Security, Hook Security, Breach Secure Now, and Huntress Managed SAT are also strong MSP-focused options depending on your service model.
What should MSPs look for in a security awareness platform?
Beyond good training content, MSPs should look for multi-tenant management, automation, phishing simulations, policy management, dark web monitoring, client-ready reporting, human risk visibility, fast deployment, and a commercial model that supports a profitable recurring service.
Are enterprise platforms like KnowBe4 a good fit for MSPs?
They can be, especially for larger partners or enterprise clients that need deep content breadth and broad market recognition. But MSPs should compare packaging, admin effort, integrations, reporting, and delivery fit carefully before choosing an enterprise-first platform for multi-client service delivery.
What is the difference between awareness training and human risk management?
Awareness training delivers and tracks education. Human risk management connects training, phishing, policy acknowledgment, and breach exposure into a view of where risk actually sits, so MSPs can prioritize the users and clients that need attention rather than just report completion.
Do MSPs need dark web monitoring in a security awareness platform?
Dark web monitoring is a valuable addition for many MSPs. Showing a client that credentials tied to their domain have been exposed turns an abstract risk conversation into a concrete one, and supports remediation and renewal discussions.
How do MSPs prove value to clients in QBRs?
MSPs can prove value with reporting built for client conversations: user risk trends, prioritized actions, policy and phishing evidence, and a clear story of how risk is improving over time, rather than raw completion statistics.
Which security awareness platforms are built for MSPs?
Platforms such as usecure, Phin Security, Hook Security, Breach Secure Now, and Huntress Managed SAT are commonly considered by MSPs because they focus on partner delivery, automation, managed awareness, or multi-client service models. The right choice depends on your service model, client base, reporting needs, and whether you want awareness training alone or broader human risk management.
Abonnez-vous à la newsletter
Découvrez comment les cabinets de services professionnels réduisent le risque humain avec usecure
Découvrez comment les équipes IT des services professionnels utilisent usecure pour protéger les données sensibles de leurs clients, maintenir leur conformité et préserver leur réputation — sans perturber le travail facturable.
Articles liés
Explorez d'autres analyses, actualités et ressources de usecure.
%20(1).png)
